does anyone know how many kilowatt motor this can run?
Cant find a manual.
Looks like this:

/Jim
Moderators: Martin, Steve, Mr Magoo
I think the 3 is a poorly written 5, especially when you look at the other written numbers.Hi,
I found a paper label today, it was located ontop of one of the capacitors
I use it once a week so I hope it wont happenOne word of caution if the inverter has been out of use for some time - old electrolytics can let go if they are powered up again after a long dormant spell - they can either just leak/ooze; or they can rupture in dramatic style. The new ABB inverter/VFD I fitted to my mill came with oodles of caution; even with brand-new units they say a special capacitor reforming procedure is needed if it hasn't been used within two years of manufacture.
No other board on min, looks just like the picturesOn mine, the board with the output amps/KVA jumper is the daughter board onto which the optional braking resistor is connected (the big fast-on terminals), so I don't know if the jumper is just on there for convenience? or whether it relates to the brake? On the big photo you posted, and in the close-ups of yours, it looks as if the daughter board has been eliminated and its all one board?
Dont look as the jumpers have been on the other pins. My vfd came with my ORAC and I have used it for about 8years. Only bying a new motor because tho old are so extremely weak.What I would do is carefully pull the jumper off. Have just done that on mine and there is a clear difference between the shiny pins where the jumper just came from, and the other slightly-tarnished ones. If you can see a clear differentiation, and you know the drive came from a previously-functioning piece of kit, then I would think it is likely to be a drive of the capacity as per the jumper.
What I would then do, before buying a motor, is to power it up in a safe place to make sure it doesn't go pop .....
If I by a new 1,5kW motor and plug it in and the vfd is not an vc-150. What can happen?I think the 3 is a poorly written 5, especially when you look at the other written numbers.
It certainly looks to have the same functions, terminals, leds etc as the manual I posted except in a slightly different board layout (comparing it to the 1st picture you posted)
The other manuals I have found are for VN110 VN150...HVL02...LVL02..CD75 CD110 CD150... etc..
Jim,
yes, to be honest, I think Admin is right - the idea that it should say VC-150 instead of what looks like VC-130 did cross my mind and that was partly what I was hinting at in that I couldn't find reference to a VC-130 anywhere online either.
I would be pretty sure its a VC-150 ....
In case it helps, attached are a few pictures to match yours of the Denford-fitted VC-150 that was on my Senior 3C CNC mill (which I suspect is a slightly earlier edition of yours - my VC-150 is QC dated 1987 which ties in with my mill's 1987 date of manufacture).
But my lathe is dated 1985, so mine are older.In case it helps, attached are a few pictures to match yours of the Denford-fitted VC-150 that was on my Senior 3C CNC mill (which I suspect is a slightly earlier edition of yours - my VC-150 is QC dated 1987 which ties in with my mill's 1987 date of manufacture).
The date written on the capacitor and PCB you photographed definitely looks like 90 as in 1990; and the issue number of the PCBs is higher (i.e. newer) than those on mine - which was definitely made in 1987.kato wrote:...But my lathe is dated 1985, so mine are older. ....